WebCIR v. SM PRIME HOLDINGS GR No. 183505, Feb. 26, 2010 FACTS: SM Prime and First Asia are domestic corporations duly organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of the Phils. Both are engaged in the business of operating cinema house, among others. CTA Case No. 7079: BIR sent SM Prime a Preliminary Assessment Notice (PAN) for VAT WebFacts: On January 27, 2000, the respondent CIR sent petitioner assessment of deficiency taxes, both Value-Added Tax (VAT) and documentary stamp tax (DST) in the total amount of P224,702,641.18 for taxable years 1996 and 1997. Petitioner protested such assessment in a letter, but the respondent did not act on the protest
CIR Vs SM Prime Holdings PDF Value Added Tax - Scribd
WebCIR v. SM PRIME HOLDINGS, GR No. 183505, 2010-02-26. Facts: SM PRIME HOLDINGS, INC. AND FIRST ASIA REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. ... SM Prime filed a Motion to Consolidate CTA Case Nos. 7085, 7111 and 7272 with CTA Case No. 7079 on the grounds that the issues raised therein are identical and that SM Prime … WebJun 23, 2024 · SMPH reported a net income growth of 13% this First Quarter of 2024, to PHP6.6 billion from PHP5.8 billion last year. 62% of the revenue was from malls, 29% from residences, 4% from commercial properties and 5% was from hotels and convention centers. Photo Credit: SM Prime Holdings Long Term Growth dickinson county register of deeds mi
Film Dev
WebCIR V SM Prime Holdings, Inc Original Title: CIR v SM Prime Holdings, Inc Uploaded by Audrey Description: CIR v SM Case Copyright: © All Rights Reserved Available Formats Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd Flag for inappropriate content Download now of 17 Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila SECOND DIVISION WebCIR v. Mirant Pagbilao Atienza (Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Mirant Pagbilao Corp. , G.R. No. 172129, [September 12, 2008], 586 PHIL 712-734) Doctrine: The claim for refund is to be construed strictissimi juris against the taxpayer, meaning that the claim cannot be made to rest on vague inference. Where the rule of strict interpretation against … WebThe local government retained the power to impose amusement tax on proprietors, lessees, or operators of theaters, cinemas, concert halls, circuses, boxing stadia, and other places of amusement at a rate of not more than thirty percent (30%) of the gross receipts from admission fees under Section 140 thereof. 50 In the case of theaters or … dickinson county road commission